|
|
Post by anarchistemma on May 9, 2018 1:04:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LadyItaly on May 9, 2018 4:00:22 GMT
This is terrible! How is this happening? What is the family doing? I don't get it!  |
|
|
|
Post by denise on May 9, 2018 11:33:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by aajjgg on May 9, 2018 15:20:21 GMT
It doesn't turn my stomach at all. It is the familys right. He had allot of "stuff". How many gold watches can they keep? At the end of everyones life it is just "stuff" that people leave behind. Plus the family has moved and I would assume does not have room for all of this. Let the public have it.
|
|
|
|
Post by LadyItaly on May 9, 2018 15:49:54 GMT
Im not sure about that! I know he had a lot of stuff, but it still had sentimental value for Jerry. He cared a lot about his stuff! If I was his wife I would probably share it with family and friends, but I wouldn't sell it to strangers! It's true, he is dead now, but it's still his stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by anarchistemma on May 9, 2018 16:47:21 GMT
the watch from dean seems a specific piece that should be kept..not only sentimental but hollywood history. knowing the significance, wouldn’t a family member want this as a memento? movie props and all that i can understand...this item seems different. it’s like selling a wedding ring.
|
|
|
|
Post by LadyItaly on May 9, 2018 17:16:07 GMT
I agree! Honestly I wouldn't give anything away, but that's just me! I wouldn't sell my man's stuff. I will keep it with me where I can always see it and think about stuff! |
|
|
|
Post by Classickat on May 9, 2018 22:24:10 GMT
aajjgg Family photos shouldn't be auctioned off, yet Anthony's ex is selling off personal family photo books, in addition to the rest of the stuff she has. Selling the house makes sense, but a lot of personal mementos doesn't make sense to sell.
|
|
|
|
Post by LadyItaly on May 10, 2018 3:24:44 GMT
Yes! Exactly! Ok to sell the house, but not the rest of the stuff! Couldn't agree more!
|
|
|
|
Post by aajjgg on May 10, 2018 21:22:12 GMT
I disagree. There is no right or wrong. It is based on what that person wants to do with their deceased items. It is a personal choice. I disagree when one says "This is wrong." It is not to be honest any of our business and they have the right to do what they want with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by LadyItaly on May 11, 2018 1:50:58 GMT
Well, I kinda agree with you if the deceased was okay with that! I mean if Jerry didn't want his stuff to go to whomever wanted it then I would probably not sell it! Obviously, like you say it is a personal choice. If his wife is okay with it then she has the right to do it. I was talking from a very personal perspective because I would want to hold onto stuff that belongs to the man I loved. However, Im not sure if holding onto his stuff would help me to move on! So you have to be in the situation really.
|
|
|
|
Post by Classickat on May 11, 2018 4:07:51 GMT
Patti is still alive and they have been selling her stuff off for years. Probably without her knowing. I don't trust Anthony whatsoever. Apparently he had issues with both parents to treat them so awful.
|
|
|
|
Post by aajjgg on May 11, 2018 14:40:00 GMT
How do you know it is Anthony that is selling this stuff? I assumed it was Sam.
|
|
|
|
Post by Classickat on May 12, 2018 8:37:26 GMT
Sharon Lewis is a big seller on ebay for like the last 4 years. Anthony gave her permission to sell it all. I have bought some stuff, even though it makes me annoyed that they are selling stuff off. By buying some items, at least I am making sure they are cared for. Whenever Anthony left his ex wife, he left all of Patti's stuff there. She has been selling it off ever since. She claims it is going to Patti's care, which I highly doubt.
I didn't say Anthony was selling off the stuff in this auction, I was referring to the ebay auctions over the last 5 years in which he gave his ok. Sam is possibly selling off the stuff in this auction but not sure. We know a son sold off the Margaret Keane portrait, and that was likely Chris or Anthony. Chris has sold off numerous items to fans/sellers in the past, so it likely was Chris on the portrait.
|
|
